<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Versta Research Blog &#187; verbatims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.verstaresearch.com/blog/tag/verbatims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.verstaresearch.com/blog</link>
	<description>Versta Research is a full service research firm specializing in  customized market research and public opinion polling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Three Ways to Improve Online Verbatim Data</title>
		<link>http://www.verstaresearch.com/blog/three-ways-to-improve-online-verbatim-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verstaresearch.com/blog/three-ways-to-improve-online-verbatim-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hopper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Surveys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verbatims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verstaresearch.com/blog/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good open-ended questions and thoughtful responses to these questions can yield amazingly rich and insightful data.  But given the generally poor quality of responses to open-ended question in mail surveys, some have speculated that open-ended questions in online surveys would suffer a similar fate.
Research seems to show this is not the case.  Further, a study [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good open-ended questions and thoughtful responses to these questions can yield amazingly rich and insightful data.  But given the generally poor quality of responses to open-ended question in mail surveys, some have speculated that open-ended questions in online surveys would suffer a similar fate.</p>
<p>Research seems to show this is not the case.  Further, a study just published in the Summer 2009 issue of <a title="Abstract of POQ Article" href="http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/73/2/325" target="_blank"><em>Public Opinion Quarterly</em></a> outlines three ways that we can improve the quality of responses in on-line surveys:</p>
<p><span id="more-48"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Make the boxes in which respondents type their answers larger</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Explain to respondents that their answers can exceed the size of the box</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Tell respondents how valuable their input is, and encourage thoughtful answers to each open-ended question</li>
</ul>
<p>These simple techniques will encourage respondents to give more complete, detailed, and thoughtful answers to our questions, yielding rich and insightful data.</p>
<p>&#8211;<a title="Hopper Bio, Versta Research" href="http://www.verstaresearch.com/leadership.html" target="_self">Joe Hopper</a>, Ph.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verstaresearch.com/blog/three-ways-to-improve-online-verbatim-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

